First of all, I think it's odd that people who cover politics wouldn't have any political views.
To be a very, very minor, eighth-tier celebrity, you realize, 'Hey, celebrities are just like us.'
In politics people build whole reputations off of getting one thing right.
You don't want to influence the same system you are trying to forecast.
I have the same friends and the same bad habits.
Accountability doesn't mean apologizing.
To the extent that you can find ways where you're making predictions, there's no substitute for testing yourself on real-world situations that you don't know the answer to in advance.
Voters' memories will fade some.
If you're keeping yourself in the bubble and only looking at your own data or only watching the TV that fits your agenda then it gets boring.
The key to making a good forecast is not in limiting yourself to quantitative information.
You can build a statistical model and that's all well and good, but if you're dealing with a new type of financial instrument, for example, or a new type of situation - then the choices you're making are pretty arbitrary in a lot of respects.
People attach too much importance to intangibles like heart, desire and clutch hitting.
I know it's cheaper to fund an op-ed columnist than a team of reporters, but I think it confuses the mission of what these great journalistic brands are about.
I was looking for something like baseball, where there's a lot of data and the competition was pretty low. That's when I discovered politics.
We look at all the polls, not just the Gallup Poll. So, it's kind of like if you have, you know, four out of five doctors agree that reducing cholesterol reduces your risk of a heart attack, Gallup is like the fifth doctor.
The Protestant Reformation had a lot to do with the printing press, where Martin Luther's theses were reproduced about 250,000 times. And so you had widespread dissemination of ideas that hadn't circulated in the mainstream before.
Whenever you have dynamic interactions between 300 million people and the American economy acting in really complex ways, that introduces a degree of almost chaos theory to the system, in a literal sense.
To my friends, I’m kind of sexually gay but ethnically straight.
Expert estimates of probability are often off by factors of hundreds or thousands. [...] I used to be annoyed when the margin of error was high in a forecasting model that I might put together. Now I view it as perhaps the single most important piece of information that a forecaster provides. When we publish a forecast on FiveThirtyEight, I go to great lengths to document the uncertainty attached to it, even if the uncertainty is sufficiently large that the forecast won't make for punchy headlines.
Not only does political coverage often lose the signal—it frequently accentuates the noise.
All I know is that I have way more stuff that I want to write about than I possibly have time to.
We're living in a world where Google beats Gallup.
People still don't appreciate how ephemeral success is.
If you aren't taking a representative sample, you won't get a representative snapshot.
If I had a spreadsheet on my computer, it looked like I was busy.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: