Besides, do any of us understand what we are doing? If we did, would we ever do it?
There is a history of mathematical models of oligopolistic competition dating from Cournot to the theory of games. There is also a literature generated by institutional economists, lawyers, and administrators interested in formulating and implementing public policy. It has been the tendency of these groups to work almost as though the other did not exist.
The discipline of colleges and universities is in general contrived, not for the benefit of the students, but for the interest, or more properly speaking, for the ease of the masters. Its object is, in all cases, to maintain the authority of the master, and whether he neglects or performs his duty, to oblige the students in all cases to behave toward him as if he performed it with the greatest diligence and ability.
But part of the job of economics is weeding out errors. That is much harder than making them, but also more fun.
Where combination is possible, competition is impossible.
...it is distressing how often one can guess the answer given to an economic question merely by knowing who asks it.
"Law professors were never like economics professors," a Harvard Law professor told me. "If you disagreed with someone, you didn't call him a fool."
To stick to the present situation would be something like a man who was observed in Times Square looking earnestly along the pavement. He was asked what he was looking for. He said "I lost my watch."
The consequences for human welfare involved in questions like these are simply staggering: once one starts to think about them, it is hard to think about anything else.
When I was a graduate student, estimating and interpreting distributed lags topped the agenda of macroeconomists and other applied economists.
Scholars today are under increasing pressure to publish. Consequences of this pressure are incentives to deviate from the truth
Economy is too late when you are at the bottom of your purse.
Give me a one-handed economist! All my economists say, On the one hand on the other.
Commerce has set the mark of selfishness, the signet of its all-enslaving power, upon a shining ore, and called it gold: before whose image bow the vulgar great, the vainly rich, the miserable proud, the mob of peasants, nobles, priests, and kings, and with blind feelings reverence the power that grinds them to the dust of misery.
Reformers have the idea that change can be achieved by brute sanity.
When men are employed they are best contented.
Investment is a flighty bird which needs to be controlled.
Nothing so weakens government as persistent inflation.
Why does a public discussion of economic policy so often show the abysmal ignorance of the participants?
We might as well reasonably dispute whether it is the upper or the under blade of a pair of scissors that cuts a piece of paper, as whether value is governed by demand or supply.
Lack of money is the root of of all evil.
The truth is never pure and rarely simple.
Money is a machine for doing quickly and commodiously what would be done, though less quickly and commodiously, without it.
There is always enough for the needy, there is never enough for the greedy.
Inflation is like toothpaste. Once it's out, you can hardly get it back in again.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: