I've experienced several different healing methodologies over the years - counseling, self-help seminars, and I've read a lot - but none of them will work unless you really want to heal.
Truth has nothing to do with the conclusion, and everything to do with the methodology.
Methodology is intuition reconstructed in tranquility.
Every discourse, even a poetic or oracular sentence, carries with it a system of rules for producing analogous things and thus an outline of methodology.
The methodologies are always different but the message should be the same.
My way is to seize an image the moment it has formed in my mind, to trap it as a bird and to pin it at once to canvas. Afterward I start to tame it, to master it. I bring it under control and I develop it.
New material demands new methods, and new methods fling a challenge to old convention.
Any methodology for developing patience requires a multi-tiered approach.
There is no best way to make art, but there are a lot of better ways.
Methodology gives those with no ideas something to do.
Hope is easy; knowledge is hard. Science is the one domain in which we human beings make a truly heroic effort to counter our innate biases and wishful thinking. Science is the one endeavor in which we have developed a refined methodology for separating what a person hopes is true from what he has good reason to believe.
Historical methodology, as I see it, is a product of common sense applied to circumstances.
I don't like to think that I am a slave to technique, or so inept that I have to restrict myself to one method.
My methodology is not knowing what I'm doing and making that work for me.
Avoid methodology. If what you're doing is about technique, that's not art.
I don't claim to be a methodologist, but I act like one only because I do methodology to protect myself from crazy methodologists.
An integral approach is based on one basic idea: no human mind can be 100% wrong. Or, we might say, nobody is smart enough to be wrong all the time. And that means, when it comes to deciding which approaches, methodologies, epistemologies, or ways or knowing are "correct," the answer can only be, "All of them."
Abjection is a methodological conversion, like Cartesian doubt and Husserlian epoche: it establishes the world as a closed system which consciousness regards from without, in the manner of divine understanding.
I think that the philosopher must, for his own purposes, carry methodological strictness to an extreme when he is investigating and pursuing his truths, but when he is ready to enunciate them and give them out, he ought to avoid the cynical skill with which some scientists, like a Hercules at the fair, amuse themselves by displaying to the public the biceps of their technique.
I advance all of my canvas at one time.
For the painter, the system of painting in flat tints is superior to all others.
In my case, I used the elements of these simple forms - square, cube, line and color - to produce logical systems. Most of these systems were finite; that is, they were complete using all possible variations. This kept them simple.
They see poetry in what I have done. No. I apply my methods, and that is all there is to it.
I turned my thoughts to a still more novel mode... to compose pictures on canvas similar to representations on the stage... my picture is my stage, and men and women my players exhibited in a 'dumb' show.
A painter knows what to do by the tug of the brush as it pulls through a mixture of oils, and by the look of coloured slurries on the palette.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: