Is man merely a mistake of God's? Or God merely a mistake of man?
I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life.
Question with boldness even the existence of a god.
An atheist may be simply one whose faith and love are concentrated on the impersonal aspects of God.
I have a great love and respect for religion, great love and respect for atheism. What I hate is agnosticism, people who do not choose.
Selfishness is the only real atheism; aspiration, unselfishness, the only real religion.
Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power.
How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?
The religion of one age is the literary entertainment of the next.
The Bible has noble poetry in it... and some good morals and a wealth of obscenity, and upwards of a thousand lies.
Take from the church the miraculous, the supernatural, the incomprehensible, the unreasonable, the impossible, the unknowable, the absurd, and nothing but a vacuum remains.
A person isn't considered insane if there are a number of people who believe the same way. Insanity isn't supposed to be a communicable disease. If one other person starts to believe him, or maybe two or three, then it's a religion.
A God who kept tinkering with the universe was absurd; a God who interfered with human freedom and creativity was a tyrant. If God is seen as a self in a world of his own, an ego that relates to a thought, a cause separate from its effect, he becomes a being, not Being itself. An omnipotent, all‐knowing tyrant is not so different from earthly dictators who make everything and everybody mere cogs in the machine which they controlled. An atheism that rejects such a God is amply justified.
It will not do to investigate the subject of religion too closely, as it is apt to lead to infidelity.
To sustain the belief that there is no God, atheism has to demonstrate infinite knowledge, which is tantamount to saying, “I have infinite knowledge that there is no being in existence with infinite knowledge
An atheist is a man who has no invisible means of support.
Then why did you tell me?
Gods are fragile things, they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense.
I don't believe in God because I don't believe in Mother Goose.
Religion has actually convinced people that there's an invisible man living in the sky.
Among the repulsions of atheism for me has been its drastic un-interestingness as an intellectual position. Where was the ingenuity, the ambiguity, the humanity of saying that the universe just happened to happen and that when we're dead we're dead?
People will then often say, 'But surely it's better to remain an Agnostic just in case?' This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I've been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I think I would choose not to worship him anyway.)
They felt that science would be corrosive to religious belief and they were worried about it. Damn it, I think they were right. It is corrosive to religious belief and it's a good thing.
Theist and atheist: the fight between them is as to whether God shall be called God or shall have some other name.
Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: