Pawns not only create the sketch for the whole painting, they are also the soil, the foundation, of any position
Chess is everything: art, science, and sport.
By all means examine the games of the great chess players, but don't swallow them whole. Their games are valuable not for their separate moves, but for their vision of chess, their way of thinking.
The first great chess players, including the world champion, got by perfectly well without constant coaches.
I still love to play chess. So I do not even spend a minute on the possibility to step back.
Like dogs who sniff each other when meeting, chess players have a ritual at first acquaintance: they sit down to play speed chess.
The ideal in chess can only be a collective image, but in my opinion it is Capablanca who most closely approaches this.
Style, I've got no style.
An amusing fact: as far as I can recall, when playing the Ruy Lopez I have not yet once in my life had to face the Marshall Attack!
You can't play chess if you're groggy from pills.
I like 1.e4 very much, but my results are better with 1.d4.
It doesn't require much for misfortune to strike in the King's Gambit - one incautious move, and Black can be on the edge of the abyss.
Playing black, I put great stake in the Ruy Lopez: I liked it, feel it, and understand it; in matches with Hjartarson and Timman it served me well. - on preparing for World Championship versus Garry Kasparov
I still remember Botvinnik's reaction to each of my games, right from the opening moves. At first he would express amazement, then annoyance, and, finally irritation.
The fact that a knight is temporarily on the edge of the board is of no great significance.
It is dangerous to maintain equality at the cost of placing the pieces passively.
The truth is that my chess development was nothing out of the ordinary, and it proceeded probably at a pace no faster than others.
The days when it was possible to win a serious game only by merit of sporting character or depth of chess understanding have vanished forever. Chess knowledge has become dominant, bypassing all the other factors that contribute to success.
I lost the match. I blame only myself for this. There were many opportunities to win. But I missed them, no one else.
But how difficult it can be to gain the desired full point against an opponent of inferior strength, when this is demanded by the tournament position!
I didn't picture myself as even a grandmaster, to say nothing of aspiring to the chess crown. This was not because I was timid - I wasn't - but because I simply lived in one world, and the grandmasters existed in a completely different one. People like that were not really even people, but like gods or mythical heroes.
I have found after 1.d4 there are more opportunities for richer play.
Furman astounded me with his chess depth, a depth which he revealed easily and naturally, as if all he were doing was establishing well-known truths.
My studies with Botvinnik brought me immense benefit, particularly the homework assignments which forced me to refer to chess books and to work independently.
No, no, it is obvious that the ECU should act as a close alliance for the benefit of chess.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: