The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike.
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid.
I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong.
I suppose that one reason I have always detested religion is its sly tendency to insinuate the idea that the universe is designed with 'you' in mind or, even worse, that there is a divine plan into which one fits whether one knows it or not. This kind of modesty is too arrogant for me.
I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses.
Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived.
Faith: not wanting to know what is true.
The Bible: a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalise mankind.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
The word 'God' is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, and religious scripture a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this.
The idea that God is an oversized white male with a flowing beard, who sits in the sky and tallies the fall of every sparrow is ludicrous. But if by 'God,' one means the set of physical laws that govern the universe, then clearly there is such a God. This God is emotionally unsatisfying... it does not make much sense to pray to the law of gravity.
Religions are like pills, which must be swallowed whole without chewing.
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
Imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, " This is an interesting world I find myself in, an interesting hole I find myself in; fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well! It must have been made to have me in it!
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
I would love to believe that when I die I will live again, that some thinking, feeling, remembering part of me will continue. But as much as I want to believe that, and despite the ancient and worldwide cultural traditions that assert an afterlife, I know of nothing to suggest that it is more than wishful thinking.
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
Yes, I think I use the term radical rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as atheist some people will say, Don't you mean agnostic? I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one...etc., etc. It's easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal and that it's an opinion I hold seriously.
If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: