Here is part of the tradeoff with diversification. You must be diversified enough to survive bad times or bad luck so that skill and good process can have the chance to pay off over the long term.
Diversification is a protection against ignorance. It makes very little sense for those who know what they're doing.
Diversification may preserve wealth, but concentration builds wealth.
Diversification is an established tenet of conservative investment.
If you invest and don't diversify, you're literally throwing out money. People don't realize that diversification is beneficial even if it reduces your return. Why? Because it reduces your risk even more. Therefore, if you diversify and then use margin to increase your leverage to a risk level equivalent to that of a nondiversified position, your return will probably be greater.
Wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing.
Diversification and globalization are the keys to the future.
It's not how much money you make, but how much money you keep, how hard it works for you, and how many generations you keep it for.
Know what you own, and know why you own it.
Mutual funds have historically offered safety and diversification. And they spare you the responsibility of picking individual stocks.
There is a close logical connection between the concept of a safety margin and the principle of diversification.
In choosing a portfolio, investors should seek broad diversification, Further, they should understand that equities--and corporate bonds also--involve risk; that markets inevitably fluctuate; and their portfolio should be such that they are willing to ride out the bad as well as the good times.
To suppose that safety-first consists in having a small gamble in a large number of different companies where I have no information to reach a good judgment, as compared with a substantial stake in a company where one's information is adequate, strikes me as a travesty of investment policy.
I believe in diversification of income, because you never know what will happen. I'm a slightly paranoid person who thinks things could be ruined at any time.
Investing should be more like watching paint dry or watching grass grow. If you want excitement, take $800 and go to Las Vegas.
How many millionaires do you know who have become wealthy by investing in savings accounts? I rest my case.
Diversification is protection against ignorance. It makes little sense if you know what you are doing.
We say we are trying to buy into businesses with excellent economics, run by honest and able people at a decent price. We buy very few securities, so we look at it as "focused" investing.
Diversification is your buddy.
Risk comes from not knowing what you are doing so wide diversification is only required when investors are ignorant. You only have to do a very few things in your life so long as you don't do too many things wrong.
Saying that financial literacy means diversification is just another example of the fox teaching the chickens.
If you want to make a lot of money, resist diversification.
The idea of excessive diversification is madness.
It is our argument that a sufficiently low price can turn a security of mediocre quality into a sound investment opportunity - provided that the buyer is informed and experienced and he practices adequate diversification. For, if the price is low enough to create a substantial margin of safety, the security thereby meets our criterion of investment.
Diversification is something that stock brokers came up with to protect themselves, so they wouldn't get sued for making bad investment choices for clients. Henry Ford never diversified, Bill Gates didn't diversify. The way to get rich is to put your eggs in one basket, but watch that basket very carefully. And make sure you have the right basket.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: