A man who is an agnostic by inheritance, so that he doesn't remember any time that he wasn't, has almost no hatred for the religious.
I do not consider it an insult, but rather a compliment to be called an agnostic. I do not pretend to know where many ignorant men are sure - that is all that agnosticism means.
A man full of faith is simply one who has lost the capacity for clear and realistic thought.
A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty - it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man.
We need to be agnostics first and then there is some chance at arriving at a sensible system of belief.
But I own that I cannot see as plainly as others do, and I should wish to do, evidence of design and beneficence on all sides of us. There seems to me too much misery in the world. I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent and omnipotent God would have designedly created that a cat should play with mice.
My goal is to try to get people into a state of generalized agnosticism, not agnosticism about God alone, but agnosticism about everything.
I am aware that the assumed instinctive belief in God has been used by many persons as an argument for his existence. The idea of a universal and beneficent Creator does not seem to arise in the mind of man, until he has been elevated by long-continued culture.
I oscillate between agnosticism and atheism.
If there were no God, there would be no atheists.
Agnosticism simply means that a man shall not say that he knows or believes that for which he has no grounds for professing to believe.
If mankind were born tomorrow it would divide into groups; each would scramble to invent their one and only god, and set about butchering each-other.
I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty.
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Isn't an agnostic just an atheist without balls?
I believe that religion, generally speaking, has been a curse to mankind.
I believe that religion, generally speaking, has been a curse to mankind - that its modest and greatly overestimated services on the ethical side have been more than overcome by the damage it has done to clear and honest thinking.
I finally decided that I'm a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don't have the evidence to prove that God doesn't exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn't that I don't want to waste my time.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one.
I have observed that the world has suffered far less from ignorance than from pretensions to knowledge. It is not skeptics or explorers but fanatics and ideologues who menace decency and progress. No agnostic ever burned anyone at the stake or tortured a pagan, a heretic, or an unbeliever.
The more I study religions the more I am convinced that man never worshipped anything but himself.
No philosophy, no religion, has ever brought so glad a message to the world as this good news of Atheism.
I cannot persuade myself that a beneficient and omnipotent God would have designedly created...that a cat should play with mice.
The Bible has noble poetry in it... and some good morals and a wealth of obscenity, and upwards of a thousand lies.
Follow AzQuotes on Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Every day we present the best quotes! Improve yourself, find your inspiration, share with friends
or simply: